Last week, the largest “Unmanned Aerial Systems” trade show in the United States took place in Las Vegas. A hot topic at the conference was the legislation which could take effect later this year that will effectively ban the sale of new DJI drones in the U.S., and the impact on commercial, enterprise, public sector, government agencies, and even recreational drone users.

As of September 7, 2025, there is no official, full-scale ban on DJI drones in the United States. However, the situation is dynamic, with legislation on the verge of taking effect that could severely restrict the sale and use of new DJI products.

The Looming Deadline: December 23, 2025

The most significant development is a provision in the Fiscal Year 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), passed in late 2024. This legislation requires a U.S. national security agency to conduct a formal security review of DJI’s products by December 23, 2025.

If this audit is not completed by the deadline, a ban will be automatically triggered. Specifically, DJI would be added to the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) “Covered List,” which would effectively prohibit the sale and importation of new DJI drones in the U.S.

As of July 2025, no audit has been scheduled, leading to significant uncertainty for the drone industry and consumers.

In this podcast, Amanda and Kevin debate the “pros” and “cons” of a ban of DJI drones in the United States.

What Products are Impacted?

While a full ban is not yet in place, the potential restrictions would primarily impact the import and sale of new DJI products. This would include popular consumer and enterprise models across their product lines, such as:

• Consumer Drones: DJI’s Mavic, Air, Mini, and FPV series.
• Enterprise Drones: The Matrice series, designed for commercial and industrial applications.
• Other Products: The ban could also extend to other DJI equipment, such as their camera gimbals, accessories, and possibly even parts.

It is important to note that a potential ban would not make existing DJI drones illegal to own or operate. However, it could lead to complications. For instance, future firmware updates, official support, and warranty claims might be at risk.¹⁰ The scarcity of new drones has already made it difficult for consumers and businesses to acquire DJI products, leading to a rise in the second-hand market and concerns about future parts availability.

Who is Impacted?

A ban on new DJI products would have a wide-ranging impact across various sectors in the U.S. due to the company’s dominant market share. DJI reportedly accounts for a large majority of the commercial and consumer drone market in the United States.

1. Commercial Businesses:

A ban would be a major blow to countless commercial businesses that have built their operations around DJI’s reliable and cost-effective technology. This includes:

• Real Estate and Photography: Businesses that rely on high-quality aerial photography and videography for marketing and documentation.
• Construction and Surveying: Companies using drones for site mapping, progress tracking, and infrastructure inspections.
• Agriculture: Farmers and agricultural service providers who use drones for crop monitoring, surveying, and precision spraying.
• Filmmaking: The film and television industry, which frequently uses DJI drones for professional-grade aerial shots.

2. Government and Public Safety Sectors:

Despite a number of existing federal restrictions on Chinese-made drones for government use, a significant number of state and local public safety agencies still rely on DJI drones. A rapid ban could create major operational challenges for:

• Law Enforcement: Police departments that use drones for search and rescue operations, accident reconstruction, and surveillance.
• Fire Departments: Firefighters who use drones to assess wildfire spread, locate hot spots, and monitor emergency situations from the air.
• Public Utilities: Agencies that use drones to inspect critical infrastructure like power lines, bridges, and pipelines.

3. Consumers and Hobbyists:

The largest user group impacted would be individual consumers and hobbyists who use DJI drones for recreational purposes. The potential ban on new sales and lack of official support could limit access to new technology and make it harder to maintain existing drones.

Conclusion:

The legislative efforts to ban DJI, driven by national security and data privacy concerns, have highlighted the U.S.’s heavy reliance on a foreign-manufactured technology. While domestic drone manufacturers exist, they often do not offer the same level of performance or competitive pricing, making a smooth transition difficult for many users and businesses.

The outcome of the December 23 deadline will determine the future landscape of the U.S. drone industry.